Elections to the County Councils. Voting rates by Swedish/foreign citizens, county council and sex (Survey). Election year 2002 - 2014
Mark your selections and choose between table on screen and file format. Marking tips

For variables marked Select at least one value you need to select at least one value

observations Select at least one value

Total 5 Selected

County council

Total 21 Selected

Search

Swedish/foreign citizens

Total 3 Selected

Search

sex

Total 3 Selected

Search

election year Select at least one value

Total 4 Selected

Search


Number of selected data cells are:(maximum number allowed is 50 000)

Presentation on screen is limited to 1 000 rows and 30 columns


Number of selected cells exceeds the maximum allowed 50 000

Read more about the survey Footnotes

Footnotes

County council
The Riksdag (the Swedish parliament) on November 30 2005, decided that from January 1 2007 and onwards Heby municipality should belong to Uppsala county. Before that Heby municipality belonged to Västmanland county.
County council
The Riksdag (the Swedish parliament) on November 30 2005, decided that from January 1 2007 and onwards Heby municipality should belong to Uppsala county. Before that Heby municipality belonged to Västmanland county.
County council
The Riksdag (the Swedish parliament) on November 30 2005, decided that from January 1 2007 and onwards Heby municipality should belong to Uppsala county. Before that Heby municipality belonged to Västmanland county.
County council
The Riksdag (the Swedish parliament) on November 30 2005, decided that from January 1 2007 and onwards Heby municipality should belong to Uppsala county. Before that Heby municipality belonged to Västmanland county.
County council
The Riksdag (the Swedish parliament) on November 30 2005, decided that from January 1 2007 and onwards Heby municipality should belong to Uppsala county. Before that Heby municipality belonged to Västmanland county.
observations
Voting rates, percent
The electoral participation survey is a sample survey based on a probability sample. The given percentages, the voting rates, are therefore estimates and the uncertainty should be taken into account when conclusions are drawn. The uncertainty is expressed as the margin of error. The interval formed by the percentage estimate ± the margin of error is a 95 percent confidence interval, i.e. an interval that with repeated samples would contain the true population value in 95 of 100 cases, given that no systematic errors are present. Estimates based on less than 50 observations are considered too unreliable and are therefore presented as (..).
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points
The interval formed by the percentage estimate ± the margin of error is a 95 per cent confidence interval, , i.e. an interval that with repeated samples would contain the true population value in 95 of 100 cases, given that no systematic errors are present.
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s
The electoral participation survey is a sample survey based on a probability sample. The presented totals, the number of persons entitled to vote, are therefore estimates and the uncertainty should be taken into account when conclusions are drawn. The uncertainty is expressed as the margin of error. The interval formed by the estimate number of persons entitled to vote ± the margin of error is a 95 percent confidence interval, i.e. an interval that with repeated samples would contain the true population value in 95 of 100 cases, given that no systematic errors are present. Estimates based on less than 50 observations are considered too unreliable and are therefore presented as (..).
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±
The interval formed by the estimate number of persons entitled to vote ± the margin of error is a 95 percent confidence interval, i.e. an interval that with repeated samples would contain the true population value in 95 of 100 cases, given that no systematic errors are present.
Number of observation in sample
The electoral participation survey is a sample survey based on a probability sample.The estimates presented here are based on a given number of observations i the sample.
observations: Voting rates, percent , election year: 2002
In year 2010, the statistical method behind the estimates produced in the electoral participation survey were revised. Therefore, new estimates for earlier rounds of the survey have been made. The estimates presented here are revised and can therefore differ some from what has previously been published regarding the electoral participation in the general elections.
observations: Entitled to vote, number in 1000s , election year: 2002
In year 2010, the statistical method behind the estimates produced in the electoral participation survey were revised. Therefore, new estimates for earlier rounds of the survey have been made. The estimates presented here are revised and can therefore differ some from what has previously been published regarding the electoral participation in the general elections.
observations: Entitled to vote, number in 1000s , election year: 2006
In year 2010, the statistical method behind the estimates produced in the electoral participation survey were revised. Therefore, new estimates for earlier rounds of the survey have been made. The estimates presented here are revised and can therefore differ some from what has previously been published regarding the electoral participation in the general elections.
observations: Voting rates, percent , election year: 2006
In the election to the County Council in Västra Götaland, an appeal against the result was made. The Election Review Board approved the appeal. A re-election took place on May 15, 2011. However, the estimates presented here refer to the election day on September 19, 2010.
observations: Voting rates, percent , election year: 2010
In the election to the County Council in Västra Götaland, an appeal against the result was made. The Election Review Board approved the appeal. A re-election took place on May 15, 2011. However, the estimates presented here refer to the election day on September 19, 2010.
observations: Entitled to vote, number in 1000s , election year: 2010
In the election to the County Council in Västra Götaland, an appeal against the result was made. The Election Review Board approved the appeal. A re-election took place on May 15, 2011. However, the estimates presented here refer to the election day on September 19, 2010.

Contact and information

Information

Official statistics
Yes
Latest update
2015-03-30
Contact
Richard Öhrvall, Statistics Sweden
+46 010-479 41 58
richard.ohrvall@scb.se

Valstatistik, Statistics Sweden
+46 010-479 44 10
valstatistik@scb.se

Unit
Voting rates, percent:
Percent
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points:
Percentage points
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s:
Number in 1000s
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±:
Number in 1000s
Number of observation in sample:
Number
Reference time
Voting rates, percent:
Election year
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points:
Election year
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s:
Election year
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±:
Election year
Number of observation in sample:
Election year
Data type
Voting rates, percent:
Stock
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points:
Stock
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s:
Stock
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±:
Stock
Number of observation in sample:
Stock
Day adjusted
Voting rates, percent:
No
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points:
No
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s:
No
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±:
No
Number of observation in sample:
No
Seasonally adjusted
Voting rates, percent:
No
Voting rates, margin of error ±, percentage points:
No
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s:
No
Entitled to vote, number in 1000s, margin of error ±:
No
Number of observation in sample:
No
Creation date
2019-08-19
Responsible authority
Statistics Sweden
Matrix
ME0105I5